<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 87 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31796</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the construction of long distance pipelines falls under commercial or industries construction service for service tax liability. The appellants were ordered to make a pre-deposit to continue the appeal process. Regarding the appellant&#039;s activity for Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GWSSB), the Tribunal required a pre-deposit but granted a waiver for the balance amount during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The Tribunal directed the appellants to make a specified pre-deposit for the disputed amount within a given timeframe, with further pre-deposit and recovery of the balance amount stayed pending compliance reporting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 87 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31796</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the construction of long distance pipelines falls under commercial or industries construction service for service tax liability. The appellants were ordered to make a pre-deposit to continue the appeal process. Regarding the appellant&#039;s activity for Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (GWSSB), the Tribunal required a pre-deposit but granted a waiver for the balance amount during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The Tribunal directed the appellants to make a specified pre-deposit for the disputed amount within a given timeframe, with further pre-deposit and recovery of the balance amount stayed pending compliance reporting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>