<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 955 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306592</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, giving the benefit of doubt to the appellants, finding the evidence insufficient to establish guilt under Sections 498A and 304B IPC. Emphasizing the necessity to prove cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demands to establish dowry death under Section 304B IPC, the Court set aside the judgments of the trial Court and the High Court, acquitting the appellants of the charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:26:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 955 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306592</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, giving the benefit of doubt to the appellants, finding the evidence insufficient to establish guilt under Sections 498A and 304B IPC. Emphasizing the necessity to prove cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demands to establish dowry death under Section 304B IPC, the Court set aside the judgments of the trial Court and the High Court, acquitting the appellants of the charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>