<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 737 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306591</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the convictions and sentences imposed by the lower courts. The court emphasized the prosecution&#039;s failure to prove the basic facts required to invoke the presumption under Section 113B and the lack of credible evidence of dowry demands and harassment. The appellant was ordered to be released if in custody.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 13:19:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 737 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306591</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the convictions and sentences imposed by the lower courts. The court emphasized the prosecution&#039;s failure to prove the basic facts required to invoke the presumption under Section 113B and the lack of credible evidence of dowry demands and harassment. The appellant was ordered to be released if in custody.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>