https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31793 A communication directing classification of goods in a specified manner can be an appealable order if it finally determines rights and fiscal liability, even though investigation is still underway; on that basis, the communication was held cognisable under Section 35A. Where the departmental case was not properly placed before the appellate authority and both sides were not adequately heard, the appellate order could not stand, and the classification dispute was remanded for fresh adjudication on the material already collected and further material, after hearing both sides. en-us Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31793 A communication directing classification of goods in a specified manner can be an appealable order if it finally determines rights and fiscal liability, even though investigation is still underway; on that basis, the communication was held cognisable under Section 35A. Where the departmental case was not properly placed before the appellate authority and both sides were not adequately heard, the appellate order could not stand, and the classification dispute was remanded for fresh adjudication on the material already collected and further material, after hearing both sides. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31793