https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306590 An assignment of the beneficial interest in moneys recovered in administration proceedings was held to carry the assignor's existing equitable right to require an account, so the assignees could enforce that right against the appellants. The claim for an account was not barred by limitation because it was not a simple money claim or a trust claim within the specific limitation provisions; the residuary limitation period applied until the right to sue clearly accrued, and no clear denial of the right was shown. The claim to a one-fourth share in the purchased lands failed for want of any proved partnership or breach of fiduciary duty. en-us Tue, 14 Oct 1930 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:45:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306590 An assignment of the beneficial interest in moneys recovered in administration proceedings was held to carry the assignor's existing equitable right to require an account, so the assignees could enforce that right against the appellants. The claim for an account was not barred by limitation because it was not a simple money claim or a trust claim within the specific limitation provisions; the residuary limitation period applied until the right to sue clearly accrued, and no clear denial of the right was shown. The claim to a one-fourth share in the purchased lands failed for want of any proved partnership or breach of fiduciary duty. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Oct 1930 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306590