<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 747 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306588</link>
    <description>The High Court examined the validity of proceedings under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1965, following reassessment under section 147. It was determined that the reasons for reopening the assessment were identical to those for invoking section 263. The Tribunal found that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the transactions during reassessment, rendering the invocation of section 263 unjustified. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order was set aside. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing prior instances where section 263 orders were overturned. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:52:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 747 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306588</link>
      <description>The High Court examined the validity of proceedings under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1965, following reassessment under section 147. It was determined that the reasons for reopening the assessment were identical to those for invoking section 263. The Tribunal found that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the transactions during reassessment, rendering the invocation of section 263 unjustified. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s order was set aside. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing prior instances where section 263 orders were overturned. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>