https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306587 SC set aside the judgments below and held that defendants were entitled to leave to defend. Observing the document to be prima facie an indemnity (not an unconditional guarantee) and noting unresolved allegations of fraud/collusion, the Court found summary relief under Order 37 CPC inappropriate. The Appellants were directed to file their written statement within eight weeks; parties may disclose documents and seek expeditious hearing. Leave to defend was granted only to the Appellants (not the second respondent). Observations were held prima facie; appeal disposed of with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:41:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306587 SC set aside the judgments below and held that defendants were entitled to leave to defend. Observing the document to be prima facie an indemnity (not an unconditional guarantee) and noting unresolved allegations of fraud/collusion, the Court found summary relief under Order 37 CPC inappropriate. The Appellants were directed to file their written statement within eight weeks; parties may disclose documents and seek expeditious hearing. Leave to defend was granted only to the Appellants (not the second respondent). Observations were held prima facie; appeal disposed of with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306587