<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 164 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31791</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, and the matter was remanded to the Original Authority for consideration as a refund application. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of treating communications from adjudicating authorities as appealable decisions, following legal precedents. The decision stressed the need for fair consideration of refund requests and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 164 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31791</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, and the matter was remanded to the Original Authority for consideration as a refund application. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of treating communications from adjudicating authorities as appealable decisions, following legal precedents. The decision stressed the need for fair consideration of refund requests and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>