https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306586 The court held that the plaintiff, despite not being registered as the proprietor of the trade mark THEOBID, was entitled to maintain an action for infringement as the assignee. The court emphasized that registration is a formality, and the assignee acquires title upon assignment. The court granted interim relief to the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from using the trade mark THEOBID-D or any deceptively similar mark, citing potential harm to the registered owner. The order was made effective one month from the judgment to minimize disruption to the defendant's business. en-us Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:15:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306586 The court held that the plaintiff, despite not being registered as the proprietor of the trade mark THEOBID, was entitled to maintain an action for infringement as the assignee. The court emphasized that registration is a formality, and the assignee acquires title upon assignment. The court granted interim relief to the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from using the trade mark THEOBID-D or any deceptively similar mark, citing potential harm to the registered owner. The order was made effective one month from the judgment to minimize disruption to the defendant's business. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306586