<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 363 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433848</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted after the court noted that investigation had been completed, chargesheet and supplementary chargesheet were filed, and the prosecution case rested largely on documentary material. The applicant had remained in judicial custody since July 2021, had no prior criminal antecedents, and was similarly placed to a co-accused already on bail. As no useful purpose was seen in continued custody, further incarceration was held unwarranted and bail was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 363 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433848</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted after the court noted that investigation had been completed, chargesheet and supplementary chargesheet were filed, and the prosecution case rested largely on documentary material. The applicant had remained in judicial custody since July 2021, had no prior criminal antecedents, and was similarly placed to a co-accused already on bail. As no useful purpose was seen in continued custody, further incarceration was held unwarranted and bail was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>