<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 362 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433847</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a GST registration cancellation case involving a proprietary firm. Despite appeal rejection, the court found procedural irregularities and lack of fair hearing. The HC set aside previous orders and remanded the matter to the tax authority for reconsideration, directing the petitioner to submit required returns. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness in tax proceedings, particularly given the absence of a GST Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 362 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433847</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a GST registration cancellation case involving a proprietary firm. Despite appeal rejection, the court found procedural irregularities and lack of fair hearing. The HC set aside previous orders and remanded the matter to the tax authority for reconsideration, directing the petitioner to submit required returns. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness in tax proceedings, particularly given the absence of a GST Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>