<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 360 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433845</link>
    <description>HC found a violation of natural justice principles in the refund application rejection. The contradictory notice timelines and denial of personal hearing were deemed procedurally unfair. The court quashed the original order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed the respondent to issue fresh orders within twelve weeks, ensuring proper due process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 360 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433845</link>
      <description>HC found a violation of natural justice principles in the refund application rejection. The contradictory notice timelines and denial of personal hearing were deemed procedurally unfair. The court quashed the original order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed the respondent to issue fresh orders within twelve weeks, ensuring proper due process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>