<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 345 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the deletion of additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). It found business receipts declared under Section 44AD covered the amounts, and the belatedly produced accounts were consistent. The Tribunal held the additions unjustified, emphasizing they led to double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 345 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the deletion of additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). It found business receipts declared under Section 44AD covered the amounts, and the belatedly produced accounts were consistent. The Tribunal held the additions unjustified, emphasizing they led to double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>