<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433817</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decisions of the Original, Appellate, and Revisional Authorities, emphasizing the discretionary power under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the justifiability of the reasons provided for rejecting the redemption application. The court dismissed the writ petition, highlighting the lack of merit and rejecting any interference through Article 226 due to the violation of regulations and the finality of the confiscation order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:44:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433817</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decisions of the Original, Appellate, and Revisional Authorities, emphasizing the discretionary power under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the justifiability of the reasons provided for rejecting the redemption application. The court dismissed the writ petition, highlighting the lack of merit and rejecting any interference through Article 226 due to the violation of regulations and the finality of the confiscation order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>