<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 327 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433812</link>
    <description>The court held that the constitution of an arbitral tribunal was premature due to the interim moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The petitioner was permitted to initiate arbitration proceedings after the moratorium ends and if the National Company Law Tribunal rules in favor of the petitioner. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 327 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433812</link>
      <description>The court held that the constitution of an arbitral tribunal was premature due to the interim moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The petitioner was permitted to initiate arbitration proceedings after the moratorium ends and if the National Company Law Tribunal rules in favor of the petitioner. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>