https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306573 Relief under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC is available only where the plaintiff shows, through affidavit or other material, that the defendant is about to dispose of or remove property with intent to obstruct or delay execution of a decree. Vague allegations are insufficient; the plaintiff must plead particulars and the grounds of belief. On the stated facts, the claim that the defendant was contemplating alienation of assets lacked adequate supporting material, and the alleged acknowledgment of liability was found incorrect. The essential requirement of dishonest intention to defeat execution was not established, so attachment before judgment or security could not be ordered. en-us Wed, 02 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2023 17:54:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306573 Relief under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC is available only where the plaintiff shows, through affidavit or other material, that the defendant is about to dispose of or remove property with intent to obstruct or delay execution of a decree. Vague allegations are insufficient; the plaintiff must plead particulars and the grounds of belief. On the stated facts, the claim that the defendant was contemplating alienation of assets lacked adequate supporting material, and the alleged acknowledgment of liability was found incorrect. The essential requirement of dishonest intention to defeat execution was not established, so attachment before judgment or security could not be ordered. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306573