https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306572 The High Court allowed the revision petition, holding that defendant No. 2 was improperly joined in the suit for damages as there were no allegations against it in the plaint. The court ordered the name of defendant No. 2, International Air Transport Association, to be struck out from the plaint, emphasizing the importance of proper joinder of parties in legal proceedings. This decision clarified the application of Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and underscored the necessity of aligning parties with the relief sought in the plaint for a fair adjudication. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2023 17:52:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306572 The High Court allowed the revision petition, holding that defendant No. 2 was improperly joined in the suit for damages as there were no allegations against it in the plaint. The court ordered the name of defendant No. 2, International Air Transport Association, to be struck out from the plaint, emphasizing the importance of proper joinder of parties in legal proceedings. This decision clarified the application of Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and underscored the necessity of aligning parties with the relief sought in the plaint for a fair adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306572