https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306569 The court held that the appellants' application under Section 46 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 was not barred by limitation. However, the respondent's non-use of the trademark was justified due to special circumstances, specifically restrictions under the Import Policy. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the respondent's trademark was not removed from the register. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306569 The court held that the appellants' application under Section 46 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 was not barred by limitation. However, the respondent's non-use of the trademark was justified due to special circumstances, specifically restrictions under the Import Policy. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the respondent's trademark was not removed from the register. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306569