https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306568 A composite contractual transaction involving the purchase of land and allied assets was held capable of being pursued in one suit because the agreements and memorandum contemplated unified performance and the claims arose from the same transaction. Territorial jurisdiction was upheld since execution of the documents and payment of consideration occurred in Delhi, and the cause of action arose within the forum; no relief for creation of a charge over immovable property was sought. Interim injunction or attachment before judgment was declined because the application did not satisfy the strict statutory requirements or show any intent to defeat execution. en-us Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2023 17:09:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306568 A composite contractual transaction involving the purchase of land and allied assets was held capable of being pursued in one suit because the agreements and memorandum contemplated unified performance and the claims arose from the same transaction. Territorial jurisdiction was upheld since execution of the documents and payment of consideration occurred in Delhi, and the cause of action arose within the forum; no relief for creation of a charge over immovable property was sought. Interim injunction or attachment before judgment was declined because the application did not satisfy the strict statutory requirements or show any intent to defeat execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306568