https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306567 The court vacated the ex parte interim injunction and dismissed the plaintiff's interim application due to non-compliance with Order XXXIX, Rule 3 CPC. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of the provision and cited precedents to support its decision. Additionally, the plaintiff failed to justify the discrepancies in the use of a green color label, sales figures, and the difference between trademarks. The defendant's claim of holding a license for the trademark further complicated the case. The suit was renotified for further consideration on a later date. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2023 17:07:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306567 The court vacated the ex parte interim injunction and dismissed the plaintiff's interim application due to non-compliance with Order XXXIX, Rule 3 CPC. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of the provision and cited precedents to support its decision. Additionally, the plaintiff failed to justify the discrepancies in the use of a green color label, sales figures, and the difference between trademarks. The defendant's claim of holding a license for the trademark further complicated the case. The suit was renotified for further consideration on a later date. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306567