<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 705 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306567</link>
    <description>Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC makes prompt service of the injunction application, supporting affidavit, plaint, relied-upon documents, and an affidavit of compliance mandatory after an ex parte injunction is granted. Where the record shows that the complete set of pleadings and documents was not served, and the claimed compliance is not borne out by the Registry record, the ex parte injunction cannot be sustained. On that basis, the interim injunction was rightly vacated for non-compliance with the procedural requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 17:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 705 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306567</link>
      <description>Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC makes prompt service of the injunction application, supporting affidavit, plaint, relied-upon documents, and an affidavit of compliance mandatory after an ex parte injunction is granted. Where the record shows that the complete set of pleadings and documents was not served, and the claimed compliance is not borne out by the Registry record, the ex parte injunction cannot be sustained. On that basis, the interim injunction was rightly vacated for non-compliance with the procedural requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>