<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1095 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306566</link>
    <description>The court held that Mr. Bhandari&#039;s claim to the position of General Secretary was unauthorized and illegal due to the lack of elections until 2005. The judgment and decree in Suit No. 518/99, obtained by the Trust, were upheld as valid, with no grounds for re-examination. The plaintiffs&#039; claims for relief in the injunction application were dismissed as unsustainable litigation, lacking evidence of fraud and not in their favor based on the balance of convenience.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 17:03:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1095 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306566</link>
      <description>The court held that Mr. Bhandari&#039;s claim to the position of General Secretary was unauthorized and illegal due to the lack of elections until 2005. The judgment and decree in Suit No. 518/99, obtained by the Trust, were upheld as valid, with no grounds for re-examination. The plaintiffs&#039; claims for relief in the injunction application were dismissed as unsustainable litigation, lacking evidence of fraud and not in their favor based on the balance of convenience.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>