<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Wins Partial Relief; Extended Period Demand Set Aside u/s 73(3) of Finance Act, 1994. Normal Period Demand Valid.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68187</link>
    <description>Extended Period of Limitation - The appellant alternatively claimed the benefit of Section 73 (3) of finance Act, 1994 on the ground that the entire service tax along with interest paid prior to show cause notice. Considering this position the demand for extended period is not sustainable hence the same is set aside. Demand for the normal period if any, is sustained along with interest. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 11:08:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 11:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Wins Partial Relief; Extended Period Demand Set Aside u/s 73(3) of Finance Act, 1994. Normal Period Demand Valid.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68187</link>
      <description>Extended Period of Limitation - The appellant alternatively claimed the benefit of Section 73 (3) of finance Act, 1994 on the ground that the entire service tax along with interest paid prior to show cause notice. Considering this position the demand for extended period is not sustainable hence the same is set aside. Demand for the normal period if any, is sustained along with interest. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 11:08:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>