<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 298 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the extended period for issuing a show cause notice for payment of service tax on advance fees collected by the appellant was justified due to deliberate suppression of facts. However, the appeal was allowed solely on the ground of limitation as the notice invoking the extended period was deemed time-barred since the Revenue was already aware of the advance fees collection and tax amount involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 298 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the extended period for issuing a show cause notice for payment of service tax on advance fees collected by the appellant was justified due to deliberate suppression of facts. However, the appeal was allowed solely on the ground of limitation as the notice invoking the extended period was deemed time-barred since the Revenue was already aware of the advance fees collection and tax amount involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>