<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 322 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433807</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC quashed provisional attachment of petitioner&#039;s bank account, finding the revenue department failed to follow proper procedures under section 83 and CBEC Circular guidelines before attachment. The court noted absence of required FORM DRC-01A issuance and lack of circumspection in using extraordinary remedy. However, considering inquiry against supplier and petitioner&#039;s purchases worth Rs.37,21,420, court directed partial release allowing bank to withhold specific tax amounts of Rs.3,95,568 (2018-19) and Rs.1,72,104 (2019-20) pending liability crystallization, with petitioner required to furnish bond for remaining penalty and interest amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 322 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433807</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC quashed provisional attachment of petitioner&#039;s bank account, finding the revenue department failed to follow proper procedures under section 83 and CBEC Circular guidelines before attachment. The court noted absence of required FORM DRC-01A issuance and lack of circumspection in using extraordinary remedy. However, considering inquiry against supplier and petitioner&#039;s purchases worth Rs.37,21,420, court directed partial release allowing bank to withhold specific tax amounts of Rs.3,95,568 (2018-19) and Rs.1,72,104 (2019-20) pending liability crystallization, with petitioner required to furnish bond for remaining penalty and interest amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>