https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31779 The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on supervision charges received by the appellants, considering the services provided akin to consulting engineer's service. The plea to transfer tax liability to M/s. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. as sub-consultants for TISCO was dismissed. Penalties under Sections 76 to 78 of the Finance Act were waived due to the appellants' genuine belief in non-liability, but penal liability under Section 75A was upheld. The appeal was allowed to the extent of setting aside penalties under Sections 76 to 78. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31779 The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on supervision charges received by the appellants, considering the services provided akin to consulting engineer's service. The plea to transfer tax liability to M/s. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. as sub-consultants for TISCO was dismissed. Penalties under Sections 76 to 78 of the Finance Act were waived due to the appellants' genuine belief in non-liability, but penal liability under Section 75A was upheld. The appeal was allowed to the extent of setting aside penalties under Sections 76 to 78. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31779