<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1343 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for bogus purchases based on information from the Sales Tax Department. The Tribunal ruled that penalty on estimated income is not permissible and disallowance of purchases on an ad-hoc basis does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal was dismissed on 03.02.2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 10:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1343 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for bogus purchases based on information from the Sales Tax Department. The Tribunal ruled that penalty on estimated income is not permissible and disallowance of purchases on an ad-hoc basis does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal was dismissed on 03.02.2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>