<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 293 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the assessment of warehousing charges as &quot;Income from business&quot; instead of &quot;Income from house property.&quot; The order of the CIT(Appeals) upholding the classification under &quot;Income from house property&quot; was set aside, emphasizing the systematic conduct of warehousing activities as indicative of business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 293 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the assessment of warehousing charges as &quot;Income from business&quot; instead of &quot;Income from house property.&quot; The order of the CIT(Appeals) upholding the classification under &quot;Income from house property&quot; was set aside, emphasizing the systematic conduct of warehousing activities as indicative of business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>