<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 367 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306545</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the transferred employee could not claim a superannuation age of 60 years from the acquiring bank but was bound by the age of 58 years applicable in the acquiring bank. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 11:39:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 367 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306545</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the transferred employee could not claim a superannuation age of 60 years from the acquiring bank but was bound by the age of 58 years applicable in the acquiring bank. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>