<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 184 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31770</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of service tax under the &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; category. The appellants&#039; activity of handling export cargo was deemed excluded from the definition of &#039;cargo handling service,&#039; making it challenging for the Revenue to establish that the service provided was taxable under BAS. Due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the provision of a taxable service to the foreign party on behalf of Indian clients, the Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the service tax, interest, and penalties demanded by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 184 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31770</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of service tax under the &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; category. The appellants&#039; activity of handling export cargo was deemed excluded from the definition of &#039;cargo handling service,&#039; making it challenging for the Revenue to establish that the service provided was taxable under BAS. Due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the provision of a taxable service to the foreign party on behalf of Indian clients, the Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the service tax, interest, and penalties demanded by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>