<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 276 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433761</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax refund orders. The court found authorities improperly rejected input tax credit refund application despite rectification of initial documentation error. HC remanded matter to Adjudicating Authority, directing fresh consideration of refund claim within four weeks and mandating opportunity for petitioner to be heard before potential rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 276 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433761</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax refund orders. The court found authorities improperly rejected input tax credit refund application despite rectification of initial documentation error. HC remanded matter to Adjudicating Authority, directing fresh consideration of refund claim within four weeks and mandating opportunity for petitioner to be heard before potential rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>