<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 271 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433756</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the ITAT&#039;s order, and remitted the case for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the importance of factoring in the property purchase consideration and directed the ITAT to make decisions independently without being influenced by the court&#039;s observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 07:36:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 271 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433756</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the ITAT&#039;s order, and remitted the case for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the importance of factoring in the property purchase consideration and directed the ITAT to make decisions independently without being influenced by the court&#039;s observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>