<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 266 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to apply a commission rate of 0.5% instead of 1.8%, reducing the addition by Rs. 4,68,43,464/- for the appellant. The Tribunal found the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in dismissing the appeal without providing a reasoned order and in confirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s action despite evidence presented. The appellant&#039;s claim of inadequate opportunity to be heard was also considered, with the Tribunal emphasizing procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 07:36:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 266 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing the Assessing Officer to apply a commission rate of 0.5% instead of 1.8%, reducing the addition by Rs. 4,68,43,464/- for the appellant. The Tribunal found the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in dismissing the appeal without providing a reasoned order and in confirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s action despite evidence presented. The appellant&#039;s claim of inadequate opportunity to be heard was also considered, with the Tribunal emphasizing procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>