<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 265 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals by the assessee, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, lacked justification for penalties, and noted discrepancies in penalty notices. Consequently, the penalties were deemed unsustainable and were deleted, resulting in the appeals being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 07:36:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 265 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals by the assessee, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, lacked justification for penalties, and noted discrepancies in penalty notices. Consequently, the penalties were deemed unsustainable and were deleted, resulting in the appeals being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>