<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 241 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433726</link>
    <description>The appeal involved a dispute over the reduction of redemption fine and penalty imposed on an importer for importing old and used goods without proper declaration. The Commissioner (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine to Rs. 1 lakh and the penalty to Rs. 50,000, considering the importer&#039;s genuine mistake. The revenue challenged this decision, arguing that the importer had agreed to pay the amounts and re-exported the goods. However, the Member (Judicial) upheld the reduction, emphasizing the importer&#039;s statutory right to appeal despite agreeing to pay during adjudication. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 07:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 241 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433726</link>
      <description>The appeal involved a dispute over the reduction of redemption fine and penalty imposed on an importer for importing old and used goods without proper declaration. The Commissioner (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine to Rs. 1 lakh and the penalty to Rs. 50,000, considering the importer&#039;s genuine mistake. The revenue challenged this decision, arguing that the importer had agreed to pay the amounts and re-exported the goods. However, the Member (Judicial) upheld the reduction, emphasizing the importer&#039;s statutory right to appeal despite agreeing to pay during adjudication. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>