<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 237 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, determining that Redbrick Consulting Pvt. Ltd. did not qualify as an MSME due to the lack of Udyam Registration, rendering it ineligible to claim benefits under section 240-A of the IBC. Additionally, the Tribunal found Redbrick Consulting Pvt. Ltd. ineligible to submit a resolution plan under section 29-A of the IBC due to Mr. Gnyandeep Kantipudi&#039;s dual directorship. Consequently, the e-auction was set aside, and the liquidator was instructed to conduct a fresh valuation and re-auction the corporate debtor. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 237 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, determining that Redbrick Consulting Pvt. Ltd. did not qualify as an MSME due to the lack of Udyam Registration, rendering it ineligible to claim benefits under section 240-A of the IBC. Additionally, the Tribunal found Redbrick Consulting Pvt. Ltd. ineligible to submit a resolution plan under section 29-A of the IBC due to Mr. Gnyandeep Kantipudi&#039;s dual directorship. Consequently, the e-auction was set aside, and the liquidator was instructed to conduct a fresh valuation and re-auction the corporate debtor. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>