https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433721 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the summoning order issued by the Special Judge in Ghaziabad, emphasizing that the Special Court in the area where the offence is committed has jurisdiction over both the money-laundering offence and any scheduled offence connected to it. It clarified that the trial of the scheduled offence should follow the trial of the money-laundering offence. The Court highlighted that the determination of territorial jurisdiction hinges on the evidence relating to where the money-laundering activities occurred, allowing the petitioner to address this issue before the Trial Court. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433721 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the summoning order issued by the Special Judge in Ghaziabad, emphasizing that the Special Court in the area where the offence is committed has jurisdiction over both the money-laundering offence and any scheduled offence connected to it. It clarified that the trial of the scheduled offence should follow the trial of the money-laundering offence. The Court highlighted that the determination of territorial jurisdiction hinges on the evidence relating to where the money-laundering activities occurred, allowing the petitioner to address this issue before the Trial Court. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433721