<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 232 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433717</link>
    <description>The High Court waived the pre-deposit requirement for the petitioner, facing extreme financial hardship due to the closure of their unit since 2006. Citing previous judgments, the Court found the 10% deposit of Rs.1.25 crores onerous and allowed the petitioner to appeal before the CESTAT without the pre-deposit burden.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 232 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433717</link>
      <description>The High Court waived the pre-deposit requirement for the petitioner, facing extreme financial hardship due to the closure of their unit since 2006. Citing previous judgments, the Court found the 10% deposit of Rs.1.25 crores onerous and allowed the petitioner to appeal before the CESTAT without the pre-deposit burden.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>