<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1546 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306542</link>
    <description>Commercial disputes may be disposed of by summary judgment where the court can fairly determine the material facts on the paper record and the defence shows no real prospect of success. On the facts discussed, the plaintiff&#039;s registered Class 9 trade mark rights in SU-KAM were treated as exclusive, and earlier licence and business transfer documents did not displace those rights. The assignment deed was treated as invalid for breach of fiduciary duty and defective board action, while recordal was required to rely on it. Estoppel also arose from prior representations of ownership, and limitation ran only from the first clear denial of title.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 07:32:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1546 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306542</link>
      <description>Commercial disputes may be disposed of by summary judgment where the court can fairly determine the material facts on the paper record and the defence shows no real prospect of success. On the facts discussed, the plaintiff&#039;s registered Class 9 trade mark rights in SU-KAM were treated as exclusive, and earlier licence and business transfer documents did not displace those rights. The assignment deed was treated as invalid for breach of fiduciary duty and defective board action, while recordal was required to rely on it. Estoppel also arose from prior representations of ownership, and limitation ran only from the first clear denial of title.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>