https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306544 Additional evidence in a land acquisition compensation appeal may be admitted under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC where the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment or where its admission is necessary for another substantial cause. The High Court erred by not applying that test to documents said to bear directly on fair market value. Since the proposed material went to the core issue of fair compensation, rejection of the application was unsustainable. The additional documents, however, had first to be proved as to existence, authenticity, genuineness and contents before reliance could be placed on them, and the matter was remanded to the Reference Court for fresh adjudication. en-us Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Sep 2025 12:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306544 Additional evidence in a land acquisition compensation appeal may be admitted under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC where the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment or where its admission is necessary for another substantial cause. The High Court erred by not applying that test to documents said to bear directly on fair market value. Since the proposed material went to the core issue of fair compensation, rejection of the application was unsustainable. The additional documents, however, had first to be proved as to existence, authenticity, genuineness and contents before reliance could be placed on them, and the matter was remanded to the Reference Court for fresh adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306544