<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 249 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31762</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed both appeals regarding the refund of service tax. The appellant&#039;s refund claim was rejected due to unjust enrichment, as they had recovered the amount from clients. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was denied as the tax was not paid when services were rendered, and the argument that the appellant may have recovered the amount post-certificate issuance was based on assumptions. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision in both cases, finding no merit in the parties&#039; arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 249 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31762</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed both appeals regarding the refund of service tax. The appellant&#039;s refund claim was rejected due to unjust enrichment, as they had recovered the amount from clients. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was denied as the tax was not paid when services were rendered, and the argument that the appellant may have recovered the amount post-certificate issuance was based on assumptions. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision in both cases, finding no merit in the parties&#039; arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>