<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 277 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31761</link>
    <description>The service tax dispute concerned classification of the appellant as a tour operator and the related request for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. Liability for the period before 10-09-2004 was treated as already settled in favour of the appellant, while the classification issue and the applicability of service tax to a State Government organisation for the later period were left for final hearing. As no prima facie case for total waiver was made out, the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 1 lakh within four weeks. On compliance, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 277 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31761</link>
      <description>The service tax dispute concerned classification of the appellant as a tour operator and the related request for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. Liability for the period before 10-09-2004 was treated as already settled in favour of the appellant, while the classification issue and the applicability of service tax to a State Government organisation for the later period were left for final hearing. As no prima facie case for total waiver was made out, the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 1 lakh within four weeks. On compliance, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>