https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433703 The Supreme Court held that the High Court's interference in setting aside the seizure of an import consignment was not justified without detailed examination by the appellate authority. The Court stayed the operation of the impugned order, allowing the Department to continue the investigation. Emphasizing the need for independent consideration of the appeal without influence from previous observations, the Court set aside the impugned order with specific remarks. The special leave petition and pending applications were disposed of accordingly, ensuring no prejudice to either party's interests. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:08:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433703 The Supreme Court held that the High Court's interference in setting aside the seizure of an import consignment was not justified without detailed examination by the appellate authority. The Court stayed the operation of the impugned order, allowing the Department to continue the investigation. Emphasizing the need for independent consideration of the appeal without influence from previous observations, the Court set aside the impugned order with specific remarks. The special leave petition and pending applications were disposed of accordingly, ensuring no prejudice to either party's interests. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433703