<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 183 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was liable for service tax under the reverse charge mechanism for &quot;manpower supply&quot; services, as per the precedent set by the SC in Northern Operating System Pvt. Ltd. The extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified due to the absence of &quot;wilful suppression&quot; by the appellant, leading to the dismissal of demands for the extended period in certain appeals. The imposition of interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act was upheld as mandatory for delayed payments. Several appeals were dismissed, while others were allowed or partly allowed concerning the extended period demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 183 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was liable for service tax under the reverse charge mechanism for &quot;manpower supply&quot; services, as per the precedent set by the SC in Northern Operating System Pvt. Ltd. The extended period of limitation was deemed unjustified due to the absence of &quot;wilful suppression&quot; by the appellant, leading to the dismissal of demands for the extended period in certain appeals. The imposition of interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act was upheld as mandatory for delayed payments. Several appeals were dismissed, while others were allowed or partly allowed concerning the extended period demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>