<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433631</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned orders rejecting the petitioner&#039;s duty drawback claim under Rule 7A, directing a fresh consideration by the first respondent. The court emphasized the need for a reasoned decision within eight weeks, stressing the importance of objectively considering the petitioner&#039;s submissions and granting a personal hearing. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 09:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 146 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433631</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned orders rejecting the petitioner&#039;s duty drawback claim under Rule 7A, directing a fresh consideration by the first respondent. The court emphasized the need for a reasoned decision within eight weeks, stressing the importance of objectively considering the petitioner&#039;s submissions and granting a personal hearing. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>