<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1099 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of two companies from the comparables list due to functional differences and lack of segmental data. The Transfer Pricing documentation was rejected, focusing on comparability analysis. Other issues raised were not addressed as the assessee did not press them. The decision was announced on 9th November 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2023 20:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1099 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of two companies from the comparables list due to functional differences and lack of segmental data. The Transfer Pricing documentation was rejected, focusing on comparability analysis. Other issues raised were not addressed as the assessee did not press them. The decision was announced on 9th November 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>