<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1406 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306513</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the issues of the arm&#039;s length price adjustment for royalty payments and the treatment of industrial promotion subsidy restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2023 22:32:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=703876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1406 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306513</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the issues of the arm&#039;s length price adjustment for royalty payments and the treatment of industrial promotion subsidy restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>