https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306519 Subordinate legislation framed under the repealed Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 did not survive repeal by the Electricity Act, 2003 unless expressly saved. Section 185 of the 2003 Act preserved only specified past acts and did not keep alive regulations that were not in force when the employee died or the claim arose. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 also did not preserve the claim because no accrued right existed before repeal, and the definition of "rule" did not revive the repealed regulations. The claim was therefore to be considered only under the industrial settlement then in force, not under the repealed regulations. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Feb 2023 22:32:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306519 Subordinate legislation framed under the repealed Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 did not survive repeal by the Electricity Act, 2003 unless expressly saved. Section 185 of the 2003 Act preserved only specified past acts and did not keep alive regulations that were not in force when the employee died or the claim arose. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 also did not preserve the claim because no accrued right existed before repeal, and the definition of "rule" did not revive the repealed regulations. The claim was therefore to be considered only under the industrial settlement then in force, not under the repealed regulations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306519