<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 353 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31740</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of confiscation of the barges and imposition of penalties on the appellants for violating the Customs Act, 1962 by removing the barges without proper clearances and failing to comply with customs procedures. The Tribunal also rejected the appellants&#039; claims for exemptions under various notifications, emphasizing their inapplicability. The appeals were dismissed, and the Commissioner&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 353 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31740</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of confiscation of the barges and imposition of penalties on the appellants for violating the Customs Act, 1962 by removing the barges without proper clearances and failing to comply with customs procedures. The Tribunal also rejected the appellants&#039; claims for exemptions under various notifications, emphasizing their inapplicability. The appeals were dismissed, and the Commissioner&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>