<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reimbursement for free after-sale service provided by the appellant to their dealers should not be included in the assessable value of motorcycles. The invocation of the extended limitation period under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act was deemed unreasonable due to the department&#039;s delayed action. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 11AC was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with the impugned order being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 258 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reimbursement for free after-sale service provided by the appellant to their dealers should not be included in the assessable value of motorcycles. The invocation of the extended limitation period under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act was deemed unreasonable due to the department&#039;s delayed action. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 11AC was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with the impugned order being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>