https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433597 The appeal was dismissed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) confirming the addition of Rs. 37,12,424 as suppression of sales by the Assessing Officer. Despite multiple opportunities and efforts to engage the assessee, there was continuous non-compliance, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The appellant's justifications for the suppressed sales were deemed insufficient, with no concrete proof provided. The Accountant Member upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing the appellant's failure to provide a satisfactory explanation and relevant documentation for the significant loss incurred. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)'s findings. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Feb 2023 08:42:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433597 The appeal was dismissed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) confirming the addition of Rs. 37,12,424 as suppression of sales by the Assessing Officer. Despite multiple opportunities and efforts to engage the assessee, there was continuous non-compliance, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The appellant's justifications for the suppressed sales were deemed insufficient, with no concrete proof provided. The Accountant Member upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing the appellant's failure to provide a satisfactory explanation and relevant documentation for the significant loss incurred. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Ld. CIT(A)'s findings. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433597